
Leadership is a topic that has never remained out of the academic debate. And as an MBA student this topic is close to my interest. The environment in which we live provides a wide range of standards and practices, but as Sanders (2017) points out, a congregation that wants to be heard requires leaders who are strong, intellectual, and selfless. To build a fit with the existing state of disciple growth, leadership improvement initiatives focused on enhancing organizational performance should employ tools developed to measure the leader’s degree of operational emphasis and relational emphasis.
The contemporary leadership theories lay a great emphasis on making situational choices while keeping in view the outcomes. This also concerns how these choices can maximize the leaders’ and the company’s interests. Modern theories like Transactional theory and Situational theory of leadership come under question here.
Transactional theory:
Conventional leadership is transactional leadership. According to Weber (1947), a system of administration and collaboration is referred to as “traditional” if it is a component of an established regulatory scheme and the leader holds power based on position and the presence of individual allegiance developed via an education process. Transactional, strategic leadership describes this educational approach. For leaders striving to build their transactional leadership characteristics, there are several real-world examples, practicable exercises, and on-the-job training chances (Burns, 1978).
Criticism of the uniform approach:
Several academics have also criticized transactional leadership theory for taking a uniform, generalized approach to building leadership theories while ignoring contextual and situational aspects relevant to organizational difficulties. This notion does not fit modern organizations’ requirements (Burns, 1978). Besides the theory is rigid as it only looks from a mechanical angle and ignore ethics.
Situational Leadership theory:
Similarly, in the case of the situational theory, a strong figure with a sizable following is not essential for effective leading; instead, it calls for a reasonable comprehension of the circumstance and a suitable reaction (Bryman et al., 2011). A task-versus-people-oriented leadership spectrum gave rise to situational managerial effectiveness and Situational Leadership Theory (Lorsch, 2010). The range of the concentration of the leader, on either the necessary duties or their relationships with their followers, was depicted by the spectrum.
Preference of short-term over long-term gains:

The theory defined leadership style and emphasized the necessity to match the leader’s approach to the followers’ development. Like the transactional theory, situational leadership tends to ignore long-term objectives in favor of short-term ones. Since situational leadership is adaptable and many task-driven organizations are not, it frequently does not perform well when recurring tasks need to be accomplished.
The question of “Ethics” with benefits:
Leaders today must be moral and make wise judgments since conventional business is evolving and posing more difficult ethical concerns. Leadership behavior is described as the morally upright actions that leaders do to realize their followers’ and important stakeholders’ shared goals, objectives, and values. Deontological and teleological, which may be summed up as rules and consequentialist, are two fundamental prescriptive ethical notions.
Deontology:
According to this principle, what is good or bad is determined by the moral goodness and badness of the philosophy behind it.
Teleology
Teleology, on the other hand, determines what is good or what is bad by its consequences and how it will benefit or cause loss.

The Challenges:
Capitalism is the biggest ethical leadership challenge. The reason is that Capitalism has structured the world, mainly the developed Global North and its Western practices, in such a way that it is a race of who gets the most and who gets it first. Morals have been left very far behind, and people are looking at everything from a consequential point of view.
Benefits over ethics:
The question is, do companies lie to boost the marketing of their product? And answer is yes, they do and that’s where 90% of the myths about certain things come from, the leaders and masterminds feed people lie about a certain thing if it benefits their company. So, the absence of ethics is a huge problem, but with that said it must also be noted that the concentration on ethics is making its way into the discourse now.

The lack of ethics may provide short-term benefits but in the long run, it can only be the company’s downfall as can be noted in real-life examples.
The transgression from ethical practices and Enron scandal:
In this instance, the leaders transgressed ethical leadership and committed several crimes. For instance, Kenneth Lay, the former chief of Enron, failed to accept accountability for his conduct and for questionable business practices to occur in his organization. He was indeed a guy who seemed to have grand ideals and sought to improve all in his existence but his selfish motives and lack of ethics became a problem.
‘The Smartest Guys in the room’:
Alex Gibney in “Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room” reveals that in 1987, there was a money theft committed by two dealers. Kenneth Lay was informed by his audit firms that Louis Borget, one of Enron’s CEOs, had been implicated in misrepresenting the net value and stealing from stockholders. However, Lay chose not to make any changes because he was concerned that if he fired Louis Borget, no one would be generating income for him (Peregrine Global Services, 2020).

Ethical benefits – taking lessons from Walmart:
A great example of building ethical management is Walmart. Thanks to Walmart’s creation of numerous items with lower quantities of toxic sugars, fats, and salt, the price of fruits and vegetables has dropped.
Although these efforts actually reduce Walmart’s earnings, according to senior vice president Leslie Dach, the company nevertheless wants to boost sales and profits of all of its consumers. Michelle Obama, who attended the unveiling, and the corporation discussed this strategy to encourage healthier choices and minimize obesity in children in Washington (Stolberg 2011).

Development of theories in the future:
While every leader seeks benefits for their ventures, it should be done while staying within the ethical boundaries. But this is not just the leaders alone, academic research and theories can also play a vital role by highlighting the flaws of the consequentialist approach and keeping in account the growing significance of ethical values.
The development of leadership theories in the future should be based on ethics as the core value. Though theories like situational leadership and transactional leadership are necessary to boost leadership because managerial skills no longer require just charisma and strong moral values, the basic ethics of business should be considered.
Feminine leadership discourse:
Another important aspect is the inclusion of feminine narratives in leadership theories. These theories are not just limited to businesses but provide an understanding of leadership from a broader perspective, including leaders from all spheres of life. The traditional approaches are more inclined towards old practices and morals from the male-dominated eras, focusing on the classical idea of a male leader and his subordinates. The challenges female leaders face and how to overcome them need the attention of academia.
Regional dynamics:
Moreover, as mentioned above, one of the biggest problems is adopting Western capitalist values, which become more challenging for different social, economic, and gender groups in the Middle East, Asia, and Africa third-world countries. The marginalized groups are exploited for the benefit of the ruling elites in all spheres, which can be included in future theories in the context of the regional realities and applicability of strategies according to the overall impact, not just the gains for the leadership.
References:
Bass, B. M. (2008). The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications. Simon & Schuster.
Bales, J. (2022). Short-Term & Long-Term Goals Every Restaurant Owner Should Aim For. Blog.kulturekonnect.com. Retrieved 23 June 2022, from https://blog.kulturekonnect.com/short-term-long-term-goals-every-restaurant-owner-should-aim-for.
Bryman, A., Collinson, D., Grint, K., Jackson, B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2011). The Sage handbook of leadership. Los Angeles Sage.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper Collins.
Chains and Michelle Obama team on food desert stores | Reuters.com. (2011). Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/news/picture/chains-and-michelle-obama-team-on-food-d-idUKTRE76J5S420110720
Chains and Michelle Obama team on food desert stores | Reuters.com. (2011). Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/news/picture/chains-and-michelle-obama-team-on-food-d-idUKTRE76J5S420110720
Deontology: Definition, Theory, Ethics & Examples – Video & Lesson Transcript | Study.com. (2016). Study.com. https://study.com/academy/lesson/deontology-definition-theory-ethics-examples.html
Glynn, M., & DeJordy, R. (2010). Leadership through an organizational behavior lens: A look at the last half-century of research. In Handbook of leadership and practice. Harvard Business Press.
Gundersen, G., Hellesøy, B. T., & Raeder, S. (2012). Leading International Project Teams. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051811429573
Lorsch, J. (2010). A contingency theory of leadership. In Handbook of leadership and practice. Harvard Business Press.
Modernity Enlighment. (n.d.). Retrieved June 22, 2022, from https://ucscreativeartsfinleymiddleton.files.wordpress.com/2019/02/academicposter-modernityoliwiajaworskaandfinleymiddleton.pdf
Peregrine Global Services. (2020). Enron – The Smartest Guy in the Room. In Vimeo. https://vimeo.com/424073216
Sanders, J. O. (2017). Spiritual leadership: principles of excellence for every believer. Moody Publishers. https://www.christianbook.com/spiritual-leadership-principles-excellence-every-believer/j-sanders/9780802416704/pd/416702
Stolberg, S. G. (2011). Wal-Mart Shifts Strategy to Promote Healthy Foods. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/20/business/20walmart.htmlpagew%C2%A0%C2%A0%C2%A0%C2%A0%C2%A0%C2%A0
Visualising a Culture of Career Development | Antoinette Oglethorpe. Antoinette Oglethorpe. (2022). Retrieved 22 June 2022, from https://www.antoinetteoglethorpe.com/visualising-a-culture-of-career-development/.
What Kind of Leaders Do You Want?. @LeadingLearner. (2022). Retrieved 23 June 2022, from https://leadinglearner.me/2013/05/17/what-kind-of-leaders-do-you-want/.
Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Free Press.
Yukl, G., & Mahsud, R. (2010). Why flexible and adaptive leadership is essential. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019835
4 Common Capitalism Myths Debunked | James Davenport. Fee.org. (2022). Retrieved 23 June 2022, from https://fee.org/articles/4-common-capitalism-myths-debunked/.




